Monday, October 22, 2012

Fools in Pink


Recently I was perusing various online news pages when I came upon a front-page story about a group of women from Code Pink who were in Pakistan to take part in organized protests against U.S.-lead drone strikes targeting anti-U.S. militants.  One of the things that struck me from the article was a comment made by one of Code Pink’s leaders who said, “People are taking great risks to come here.” 

Are they really?  Let us ponder this for a moment.  They’re going to a place where anti-U.S. sentiment is very strong in order to protest against the U.S.  While there may be a certain amount of risk involved, that risk pales in comparison to the risk taken by those who defy the Taliban.  As if to magically underscore this point, the same news page also had a story about the 14-year old Pakistani girl who was sought out and shot in the head by members of the Taliban while she was at school.  Seems the girl had openly defied the Taliban by advocating education for females in Pakistan, and they decided to teach her a lesson and send a message to other girls who might question the will of the Taliban and the place of females in their society.  The juxtaposition between this girl and the Code Pinkers could not be more powerful and more revealing.  On the one hand the Code Pinkers openly tout their own bravery for actions which, if successful, assists in removing the only real threat to the likes of those who attacked this young girl.  On the other hand we have a young girl who, without ever touting her own bravery, does something truly courageous and stands up to the Taliban.  In doing so she gives the world a stark reminder of who our drones are targeting, and shows what a useful fool looks like when it dons the color pink.

At one time I might have wondered, if the Code Pinkers sincerely want to assist innocent victims of violence and are willing to risk their own lives, why don’t they organize protests against the Taliban instead of the U.S.?  After all, if the Taliban were to be defeated, there would no longer be a need for drones, correct?  That would solve everyone’s problem.  But having studied the Left for quite a long time now, I already know the answer.  In the first place, focusing on the Taliban is just so ordinary and obvious.  Anyone can hate the Taliban but it takes a very special person to understand that the U.S. is the real bad guy here, and above all the Code Pinkers truly want to be seen as special.  Secondly, standing against the Taliban might invite real risk to the Code Pinkers, and really the only blood they want to get on themselves is the fake blood they use as props when they confront civilized folks (like Condoleeza Rice) who they can rest assured will not respond with violence. 

They say you can tell a person’s true character by the things they do when they think no one is looking.  A similar law applies here.  You can tell a true leftist by their propensity to ignore the most evil in society in favor of focusing on those targets that offer the best potential for attention for the least amount of personal risk.

6 comments:

  1. You are 100% correct CW. It seems liberals are more interested in changing America than changing the women hating and genocidal governments around the globe. I do not understand it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Patrick.

      You said, "I do not understand it." Liberalism will never be understood until people realize that the primary objective of liberals is gratification of their own egos. So what does one do when one's top priority is to APPEAR to be brave? You attack those who will not attack you in return. That's why the favorite target of the Left is the U.S.

      Delete
  2. Funny, isn't it? The only thing the left is pushing as a right for women is birth control and abortion. It's funny because the yalso seem to think tha tall women are good for is sex. So why code pinp, a group that supports the left, are also pro Tahliban? I guess the next thing Liberals will be supporting is shooting little girls.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. >>”I guess the next thing Liberals will be supporting is shooting little girls.”

      Well they certainly don’t spend nearly as much time criticizing the Taliban as they do the U.S. That pretty much says it all.

      Delete
  3. Spot-on essay. Good to see that you've retained your edge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, drpete. Where you been? I've missed your blog posts. Hope all is well.

      Delete