I was flipping through an old (June 2005) issue of Architectural
Digest today when I came across a fascinating article on a property owned by billionaire
Democrat, Ted Turner. Although the writer,
Nancy Collins, coos about the “25 properties” billionaire Turner had amassed around
the world, this particular piece was about Vermejo Park Ranch, a 591,000-acre “spectacular”
spread of land in New Mexico purchased by billionaire Turner.
“As far as I know,
Vermejo is the largest contiguous piece of private land in the United States,”
boasted billionaire Turner, who was interviewed alongside his ex-wife, the radical
leftist, Jane Fonda.
“If it hadn’t been for
Ted, the land would’ve been chopped up and sold off,” the leftist Fonda proudly
chirped.
As I pondered Fonda’s evident relief that billionaire Turner’s
massive acquisition had rescued this great piece of land from the trajedy of being
divided into the dirty clutches of less-deserving, non-billionaires, I couldn’t
help but wonder how this sniffy celebration of private land ownership squares
with the Left’s usual insistence on preserving public lands for the enjoyment of all (though always at the expense
of taxpayers or other land owners, naturally). Had billionaire Turner not swooped in and
hoarded all this land and beauty for himself, the land might have been divided
into smaller parcels for people of lesser means willing to settle for a small
slice of heaven as well as to entrepreneurs hoping to share in some of the same
economic benefits that billionaire Turner and his pampered ex-wife – the leftist
Jane Fonda – enjoy. But no, this mustn’t
be allowed. Lowly commoners don’t know how
to properly take care of the land. They
aren’t capable of appreciating its beauty and its bounty the way elites like billionaire
Turner and leftist Fonda do.
“All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.” – Animal Farm
“Fortunately, America’s
most notorious cowboy rode in and saved the day…” drooled Ms. Collins (whether
or not Ms. Collins understands the terms “notorious” and “cowboy” is a question
yet to be determined)…turning Vermejo
into a mecca of ‘recreational opportunities for sportsmen who, though they can’t
afford a ranch of their own,’ explains [billionaire] Turner, ‘can afford a week here.’”
Billionaire Turner truly is a saint, isn’t he? You can’t have your own ranch because he’s
bought up all the land, but for a small fee you can come for a week and he will
allow you to admire all that he possesses.
And how affordable is a week at Vermejo Park Ranch? According to its website, “Rates [start] at $1,050
double occupancy, all meals and non-guided activities included.” So a week would cost you a mere $7,350….minimum. That billionaire Turner has a heart of gold,
don’t you think?
Now let’s talk about the billionaire, the leftist and the
environment. The purchase of Vermejo Park
Ranch included a 25,000 square foot main house (Casa Grande), an adjacent lodge
and six cottages. Per the article, “Fonda
was appalled by what she initially encountered” upon seeing the buildings for
the first time. There was wall-to-wall
carpeting and blue velvet furniture, for heaven’s sake. Naturally all this had to be ripped out and
delivered to the landfill. The
restoration/redecoration is admittedly beautiful, but I can’t help but wonder
at what cost to the environment. How much
pollution was created as crews of workmen travelled back and forth to the ranch
with their materials? And, of course,
how much pollution was created in the making of these materials? The ornate fireplace pictured in the article
featured a lovely, roaring fire. Was
this necessary to heat this massive building or was the carbon-emitting fire
made solely for the purpose of an aesthetically-pleasing photo?
I’ll cut to the chase.
I find the barefaced hypocrisy of billionaire Turner and leftist Fonda
to be as stunning as their ranch. These
are the very same people who work so hard to elect leftist politicians whose
mission is to force ordinary Americans to limit their “carbon footprints” by restricting
our access to fuel sources, vehicles, lumber, and anything else that THEY deem
off-limits. These are the very same
people who whine about the absence of affordable housing, even while they drive
up the cost of land by indulging themselves in lavish purchases of hundreds of
thousands of acres. Part way into the
article Fonda cheerfully notes that Turner owns four ranches in Montana
alone.
“We’d eat breakfast
and early-morning fish at one, and drive two hours to the next for lunch and
more fishing. Then on – an (sic) –
another couple of hours to a third for dinner,” laughed the leftist, Jane
Fonda.
Isn’t that charming?
Presumably all this driving from one ranch to another occurred after the
billionaire and the leftist flew in to Montana from one of their many other
properties located elsewhere in the country, perhaps on the private jet owned
by billionaire Turner. And I think we
can assume that some employee(s) had to drive to these ranches to cook for the
pampered pair, as it’s hardly likely that they would have stooped to such a
lowly chore themselves.
“All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.”
I’m a conservative who believes in free-market capitalism, so
I don’t mind if billionaire Turner and leftist Fonda make money and spend it as
they please; but I certainly mind when they live like capitalists while influencing
our politics like communist dictators. When
are we going to have laws that limit people like billionaire Turner and leftist
Fonda to the same small carbon footprints that they would like to see the rest
of us relegated to? The first time we
enact such laws will be the last time billionaire Turner or leftist Fonda
supports a Democrat for political office.
~CW
This and other posts by CW can also be found at the website The Pesky Truth. Please visit me there to join the conversation.
No comments:
Post a Comment