“The thought police would get him just the same. He had committed – would have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper – the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever. You might dodge successfully for a while, even for years, but sooner or later they were bound to get you.”
- George Orwell, 1984, Book 1, Chapter 1
TheFreeDictionary.com defines profiling as “the use of specific characteristics, as race or age, to make generalizations about a person, as whether he or she may be engaged in illegal activity.” In other words, to profile is to form an opinion. This means that if profiling is akin to a crime, as it’s being parlayed by the media and the Left, then it is a ‘thoughtcrime’ a la Orwell’s “1984.” It’s funny that when we read about ‘thoughtcrimes’ in that classic book it sends shivers up our spines; yet when it’s actually happening to us in real life we just go along like sheep.
Everyone on this planet makes generalizations about people based on characteristics like race, age, sex, appearance, etc., which is to say that everyone profiles. I profile people. As a woman, I am cautious about putting myself in vulnerable situations with men whom I don’t know, and the same is true for most of the women I know. That’s because we know from stories in the news and/or from our own experience that when women are the victims of crime, especially violent crimes, it’s almost always at the hands of men. So it’s just common sense and natural instinct that we would focus our self-protective energies on the people who statistically present the greatest danger to us. And although they don’t call it profiling, profiling is precisely what parents train their children to do when they teach them about who they should trust and who they shouldn’t. The following advice on profiling is from a blog on parenting:”
“… I was in the car listening to NPR and I heard a child safety educator say, ‘Stop telling your kids not to talk to strangers. They might need to talk to a stranger one day. Instead, teach them which sorts of strangers are safe. You know who’s safe? A mom with kids. Period. Your kid gets separated from you at the mall? Tell her to flag down the first mom with kids she sees.’” - http://www.checklistmommy.com/2012/02/09/tricky-people-are-the-new-strangers/#sthash.JjdqOkPO.dpuf
“…teach them which sorts of strangers are safe.” That’s great advice, absolutely. It’s also profiling, which we are being told by the Left is a bad thing to do. I can’t help but smile at the irony of this coming from NPR.
Teaching kids to profile is something parents instinctively do in order to protect their young and help ensure that they make it to adulthood. The only difference between Left and Right when it comes to profiling is that those on the Right are truthful about it while those on the Left pretend they don’t profile so that they can adopt a false air of superiority over the Right and attempt to control us.
So in light of all that let’s look at the case of George Zimmerman. Was he profiling Trayvon Martin? The answer is yes. He may not have been racially profiling, but does anyone believe he would have called the police if he’d seen an elderly man or a middle-aged woman walking on the grounds that dark, rainy night? The reason he had concerns about Trayvon is that it was apparent from his size and clothing that he was a young adult or nearly adult male. And the reason that raised alarm was because young adult or nearly adult males commit the vast majority of violent crimes and property crimes in just about any area. Mr. Zimmerman was doing the very same thing that women do when they profile and that children do when they profile as taught by their parents. He was using the limited amount of information available to him to guide his actions, i.e. calling police and keeping an eye on Martin. Those who defend Zimmerman by arguing that he wasn’t profiling unwittingly give credence to the false argument that profiling is bad and unnatural and that people should be answerable to others for their thoughts rather than their actions.
As for racial profiling, I wish someone would explain to me why race should be treated differently than gender, age or any other characteristic that’s naturally common to profiling, other than because the Left says so. If crime stats vary by race, just like they do by gender and age, then it stands to reason that people will make judgments based on race, particularly in situations where they feel vulnerable. To intentionally harm someone based solely on their race, gender or appearance is a crime – always has been, always will be. But that’s not what profiling is. It’s not a physical act. To profile is to think, and as far as I know that’s still legal. So far.