Socialism.
As a word,
I’m sure it sounds fairly innocuous to the mindless robots that seem to make up
most of the world’s population these days.
After all, the base part of the word is “social,” and heck, who doesn’t like
being social? And if you look at the
official definition of socialism in the Merriam Webster’s Dictionary, you still
won’t find anything that sounds all that sinister to a mindless robot:
Socialism: “A way
of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by
the government rather than by individual people and companies.”
Or:
1. “Any of
various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental
ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of
goods;”
2.
“A system of society or group
living in which there is no private property;”
3.
“A stage of society in Marxist
theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by
unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done;”
See?
It’s just another economic theory.
Just another “system.” The definitions don’t talk about how “the
government” comes into possession of the means of production, or how what was
once private property magically becomes public property. It ignores that whole ugly process as if it
doesn’t exist, but we know the truth, don’t we?
In order for industries to be owned and controlled by “the government”
or for private property to cease to exist the industries and the private
property must first be forcibly taken from the people who once owned them. In other words, they must be stolen. That’s the ugly truth about socialism that
gets conveniently glossed over. That’s
why someone like Bernie Sanders can openly declare that he’s a socialist and
not be viciously rejected by people who presumably would acknowledge that theft
is immoral. The robots hear “socialism”
and they’ve been programmed, thanks to public education run by the Left, to
think of it as just another morally equivalent economic alternative to free
market capitalism.
It’s no such thing.
In a sane world where personal rights
are respected, anyone who openly advocates socialism as a societal “system”
should be – at a minimum – arrested and confined behind bars for a very long
time, because there is no difference between advocating socialism and suborning
THEFT. Pray tell me what is the
difference between proposing “free” (i.e. with money forcibly taken from
taxpayers) healthcare, college and daycare and simply calling outright for
people to steal from those who have something they want? There’s zero difference, which is why
socialism is THEFT - period.
The news accounts of the thousands of
thieves-in-waiting who are filling the seats at Bernie Sanders’ rallies and
salivating at the prospect of having government as their gang leader should
sicken anyone who values economic freedom and wants to preserve it for their
children. Make no mistake - the socialists
at the Sanders rallies are no better than the smash and grab gangs we see on
the news who take what they want with complete disregard for the people they
steal from. The only difference, by and
large, is the color of their skin and the absence of hoodies. How do these people face themselves in the
mirror at night? What went wrong in
their upbringing that they are lining up for their chance to steal from their
neighbors and fellow citizens, all the while patting themselves on their backs
for their virtuousness? More
importantly, why are we tolerating this blatant threat to our property rights?
It’s not helpful that we have the usual wonks
who get out their calculators (sound familiar, Wall Street Journal?) and turn
this issue into a matter of dollars and cents rather than right versus
wrong. They answer the socialists with
calculations of how much their socialism is going to cost. LOL. Since
when are thieves persuaded by their victims’ arguments of how much the thieving
will cost them? Oh, and did I mention
that socialists are liars too? They will
always insist that everyone is better off if we give the socialists the power
to steal. As I’ve said in the past ad nauseam,
the minute free people respond to the socialists/thieves by debating the cost
of the proposed theft, the free people have lost. Period, end of story. This is an issue of rights, and it doesn’t matter
if it costs ten cents or ten trillion dollars.
We are the U.S. of A., and people are supposed to have rights to their property,
a principle that is entirely lost on socialists and wonks with calculators.
Bernie Sanders is openly and
unapologetically running on a platform of outright THEFT, and he and his
supporters should be in jail; but I will say this for Bernie: at least he is an honest thief. And don’t be fooled by those who dismiss
Bernie Sanders’ chances because he’s a proud socialist/thief. Virtually every member of the Democrat Party
is a socialist by word and deed, regardless of what label they give themselves. Obama had the same goals as Sanders, but
unlike Bernie he wasn’t so honest about his plans and his cunning approach
helped him significantly advance the agenda of the thieves in his capacity as
gang leader. Hillary Clinton is just
another thief in a pink pantsuit. For
that matter, there are a number of Republicans who fit in that ugly shoe as
well.
Earlier I asked, “Why are we tolerating
this blatant threat to our property rights?”
The answer is that we’ve been programmed to accept theft in the guise of
social policy for close to a century now, and those who understand what’s going
on also understand that there is no
political solution to this problem. That’s
right, read between the lines. That’s
one reason that the socialists/thieves are laser-focused on dismantling our
Second Amendment rights and disarming the citizenry. The other reason is that socialism thrives
when they can divide a population with wedge issues, but that’s an essay for
another day.
~CW
