tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post5984905001520684581..comments2022-05-20T21:44:50.161-07:00Comments on Common Sense Matters II: Everything I Know about Liberalism I learned in Grade SchoolCWhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18093393578438689105noreply@blogger.comBlogger33125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-79165176330497009942015-07-10T06:43:40.455-07:002015-07-10T06:43:40.455-07:00Your echo-chamber, your rules. I have to say talk...Your echo-chamber, your rules. I have to say talking politics/philosophy/history w/you is about as stimulating as playing chess w/a 5 year old--which makes you identical to about 90% of the other blogs I visit.<br /><br />America is now an Idiocracy…Democrats pander to idiots who want 'free' stuff and idiotic professional victims who think racism and sexism permeate American society…Republicans pander to nationalist-flag-waving-patriotard idiots and idiotic religious-nuts who think the Rapture is gonna happen any day now.<br /><br />The idea of actual liberty (which is in STEEP decline) doesn't appeal to the idiots in the slightest and the ignorant cowards would rather fight ghosts manufactured by their rulers--like terrorism, racism/sexism, unrestrained capitalism, the evils of marijuana, etc.--rather than look at who's spying on their every move, taking 1/2 of what they earn, and generally treating them like serfs who have no rights.<br /><br />IMO, it'd be a fitting sign of the USA's utter corruption and hopelessness if the Idiocrat electorate makes 2016 a Clinton VS Bush family affair…and the idiots will convince themselves that this is some kind of battle to the death between Good and Evil instead of two people from the same social-strata who are 99% alike on major policies...<br /><br />I've got about 2 years to go on my foreign citizenship process…it won't get here soon enough…then I escape from the insane Idiocracy! Cheers, keep up the good work exposing "dem durn libruls!KingKrawFishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13612634065260906829noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-70831701284857062592015-07-09T11:44:58.474-07:002015-07-09T11:44:58.474-07:00>>”…we're smarter, better informed, and ...>>”…we're smarter, better informed, and have a superior moral-compass than everyone else…”<br /><br />Only a fool with the mind of an adolescent would be so grossly arrogant, particularly in light of your track record here where you’ve been proven to be a hypocritical ignoramus without one original thought of your own.<br /><br />>>” …we were right on foreign-policy and neocons were horrifically wrong.”<br /><br />The fact that you think that since things went “horrifically wrong” under GWB et al that this somehow automatically means everything would be perfect if libertarians had their way just further underscores your adolescent mindset. If we come across two paths in the road and learn that one path leads to hell, it does not automatically stand to reason that the other path must lead to heaven, unless you think like a three-year-old. For all you know, both paths might lead to hell. I will certainly give self-described conservative Ron Paul credit for any correct predictions he made about Iraq and Afghanistan, but correct predictions about someone else’s leadership do not in any way translate to success for Paul. He has to prove himself and his leadership just like anyone else. I know you’re too much of a blockhead to understand that but it’s here in case a rational person happens to be reading. <br />---------------<br /><br />Barack Obama: "The debate [over climate change] is settled"<br /><br />The Unknown Einstein: “…the debate is now over…”<br /><br />Now I understand why you chose Obama as the lesser of two evils. You have a lot in common, as you both think and act like authoritarians who presume the right to decide when debates are over. Obama is saying that regardless of the law or the will of the people he is going to do what he wants. You? You’re just flapping your gums because you don’t have any power to decide when a debate is over.<br /><br />I think we’re done now, Einstein. All you do is repeat your little tirades ad nauseum. If you’re having such great success setting the blogosphere aflame, good for you. You can take your business there, cuz you’re not even generating a spark with me.<br /><br />It’s been real.<br />CWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18093393578438689105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-27401714117868513382015-07-09T07:09:51.380-07:002015-07-09T07:09:51.380-07:00>>”… in order to try to pull Cons into the P...>>”… in order to try to pull Cons into the Party…”<br /><br />Funny how you can see (and apparently forgive) the watering down of the Libertarian Party as people attach themselves to it, but in the Republican Party where it’s infinitely worse because the odds of actually achieving something are so much higher, those of us who have been victimized by the hijacking get lumped in with the hijackers. Chalk that up to more of your hypocrisy and tunnel vision.<br /><br />>>”… How do you know which candidate is the "lesser of 2 evils…?”<br /><br />That’s a bizarre question coming from the guy who chose Obama the Tyrant as his own idea of the lesser of two evils. <br /><br />I would have been more than happy to answer your question (although it ought to be evident from the posts on this blog) if I thought it was asked in the spirit of sincerely attempting to understand. Instead I know that your mind is closed, that you believe only you are entitled to decide who is the lesser evil (so much for freedom, eh?), and this is merely a rhetorical question from which you hope to regurgitate more of the same old diatribe. That won’t be happening.<br /><br />>>”I'm having a fun time setting the conservative blogosphere aflame…”<br /><br />Okey doke. <br />CWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18093393578438689105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-38991552078757655802015-07-08T16:15:32.975-07:002015-07-08T16:15:32.975-07:00And, its not that libertarians "shit doesn...And, its not that libertarians "shit doesn't stink"…its that we're smarter, better informed, and have a superior moral-compass than everyone else…the bottom line, as much as you want to deny it, is we were right on foreign-policy and neocons were horrifically wrong.<br /><br />Since the debate is now over and neocon idiots have been proven to be utterly incompetent (if not outright traitors)--yet the idiots are STILL being listened to (Israel and the Defense Industry own lots of congressmen!)--do you blame us for throwing it in your faces? Especially since you refuse to take responsibility for your idiocy? We're gonna keep on saying "I told you so" until it sinks in! KingKrawFishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13612634065260906829noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-23470246268470748902015-07-08T16:06:56.211-07:002015-07-08T16:06:56.211-07:00Unlike most Cons, Ron Paul admitted (fairly early ...Unlike most Cons, Ron Paul admitted (fairly early on I think) that he was duped by Reagan and acted accordingly. We both know most Cons still worship Reagan despite him and his legacy being complete mythology. And unlike Ron Paul, you Cons continue being duped by liars like Reagan every election cycle. "Fool me once shame on…shame on…won't get fooled agin!"<br /><br />When Williams or Maher get the nomination of the watered-down-yet-still-decent (in order to try to pull Cons into the Party) Libertarian Party, then your point about them allegedly self-identifying (which I'm not sure they even do anymore) as "libertarians" will carry more weight. As long as turds like McCain and Romney continue sailing thru the Primaries w/Con support, my point still stands.<br /><br />I've asked you this before and I will again now (maybe you'll answer me this time): How do you know which candidate is the "lesser of 2 evils" (or do you just assume its the person w/the "R" next to his/her name)?<br /><br />I'm having a fun time setting the conservative blogosphere aflame w/Con judges Roberts and Kennedy saving ACA, Kennedy siding to make gay-marriage the law of the land, and the GOP/Cons folding like a cheap card-table over the Leftist-contrived ConFed flag 'controversy'…I must've caused a couple Cons coronaries from the hilariously outraged reactions I'm getting! <br /><br />And the magic words…tell them to me…what can make Cons admit their foreign-policy ideas are idiotic and disastrous and how can I get Cons to understand the actual meaning of the word "isolationist"?<br /> KingKrawFishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13612634065260906829noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-40754987343850084572015-07-06T07:56:09.260-07:002015-07-06T07:56:09.260-07:00So I was supposed to let Al Gore or John Kerry be ...So I was supposed to let Al Gore or John Kerry be POTUS to prevent a Democrat backlash? I see. Oh yes, there was Ron Paul to save the day. But didn’t you tell me that if I support a candidate who can’t possibly win that means my vote is moot? Or is it only you who gets to hide behind a moot vote, because only your shit doesn’t stink? I hate to be crude but that pretty much sums up your whole philosophy, right? If my preferred candidate isn’t on the ballot and so I vote for the lesser of two evils, that makes me insane; but if your preferred candidate doesn’t make the ballot and you vote for a proud socialist, well you’re just doing the best you can do. I’m supposed to hang my head in shame because GWB appointed turncoat John Roberts to the Supreme Court, but you can proudly support Ron Paul even though he foolishly helped elect the evil Ronald Reagan. Conservatives are idiots because we can’t restore limited government, but Libertarians who can’t restore limited gov’t are just the victims of the statists. If a liberal progressive like Jeb Bush calls himself a “conservative,” then he’s a conservative; but if Juan Williams or Bill Mahr call themselves “libertarians,” they’re not. And we both know that if Ron Paul had become POTUS and had to settle for a less-than-ideal pick for Supreme Court nominee, that wouldn’t be his fault (or your fault for voting for him).<br /><br /><br />>>” Oh, and the magic words which can convert Cons into sane people…don't forget those!”<br /><br />Well if your straw-man arguments, juvenile smack-talk, inapt history references and generous doses of hypocrisy aren’t working, I don’t know what to say. Perhaps you’d like to try having an honest, respectful debate. Nah…..<br />CWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18093393578438689105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-52963093607490203932015-07-06T06:29:44.476-07:002015-07-06T06:29:44.476-07:00Since you voted for the guy (GW Bush) and supporte...Since you voted for the guy (GW Bush) and supported warmongering policies which guaranteed a Democrat back-lash, you tell me.<br /><br />Oh, and the magic words which can convert Cons into sane people…don't forget those!KingKrawFishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13612634065260906829noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-83627536154503333662015-07-06T05:41:42.201-07:002015-07-06T05:41:42.201-07:00Since you voted for the guy who gave us Sonia Soto...Since you voted for the guy who gave us Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, why don’t you tell me?CWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18093393578438689105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-66257238954250351202015-07-05T10:00:56.655-07:002015-07-05T10:00:56.655-07:00How does it feel for Cons that their own scotus ju...How does it feel for Cons that their own scotus judges saved ACA and delivered a DEVASTATING Culture War loss to Cons w/the gay marriage ruling?KingKrawFishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13612634065260906829noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-81239140152423985202015-07-03T21:24:40.623-07:002015-07-03T21:24:40.623-07:00>>“My vote is moot. Calif is a Democrat stro...>>“My vote is moot. Calif is a Democrat stronghold…”<br /><br />Oh, well since the country went for Obama then my vote was moot too.<br /><br />“I'm proud to have helped prevent Insane McCain…from starting WWIII against Russia.”<br /><br />Make up your mind. Was your vote moot or did you stop McCain?<br /><br /><br />“I know neocons are incapable of learning from history….”<br /><br />Says the anarcho-libertarian who ignores the entire history of human behavior.<br /><br /><br />>>”…the LAST regime (NAZI Germany) that messed w/Russia got totally destroyed…”<br /><br />You’re an ignoramus. The army of one regime or era may or may not have any resemblance to the same country’s army 75 years later, as evidenced by the defeats Russia suffered at the hands of the Japanese and Germany in WWI. <br /><br /><br />>>”If you know the words libertarians can use in order to convince Cons to stop being useful idiots for Israel, Saudi Arabia, the military-industrial complex, and oil companies by all means tell me what they are!”<br /><br />Maybe since our military strength and alliances that gave us access to oil at affordable prices were part of what made the U.S. the most powerful, successful nation in modern times “cons” are having trouble understanding why attacking the military and oil producers is anyone’s number one priority – just sayin’.<br /><br /><br />>>”Yes, I am pretty ignorant …but at least I know I'm ignorant…” <br /><br /><br />No, I don’t think you do. Someone who sincerely recognized his own ignorance wouldn’t constantly talk about how stupid everyone else is.<br /><br /><br />>>”…we've seen the results of neocon-inspired foreign-policy, but the fools who cheer-led for the wars remain blinded.”<br /><br />Oh yes, because every single military campaign is the same - not. We’ve seen the results of pacifism and appeasement too, but some people are blind to those lessons.<br /><br />>>”Funny how the USA never had problems w/the Islamic World until it stuck its big, fat nose into the middle-east's business post-WWII…amazing how when you meddle in others' affairs and take sides in conflicts that have nothing to do w/you they tend not to like it, eh?”<br /><br />No doubt about it - bullies and tyrants don’t like being messed with.<br /><br />>>”I for one will enjoy seeing Cons' oh-so-dear military continue being torn to shreds by the Islamic militias and/or Russia and/or China…nothing like seeing a bully (USA) get his comeuppance!”<br /><br />You’re an idiot and a traitor. I hope you get hit by a bus.<br /><br />>>”After already-sick-of-war [non-neocon] Americans become REALLY fed up w/your wars they'll increasingly turn to more extreme Leftists in order to get peace…”<br /><br />Hahahahahaha! Good luck with that, Einstein. Sounds like you need a refresher course on the history of wars in this country. BTW, you think you don’t like living in a strong, forceful country that gets involved in conflict? Wait until you live in a weak, passive country that no one is afraid of. <br /><br />>>”… libertarians have been nearly 100% right all along…”<br /><br />Prove it, Einstein.<br />CWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18093393578438689105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-23441968484412308992015-06-23T19:22:06.256-07:002015-06-23T19:22:06.256-07:00Patience, donkey, patience.
I've been busy. ...Patience, donkey, patience.<br /><br />I've been busy. You'll get a response when I get around to it.CWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18093393578438689105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-69610641286795047672015-06-23T15:42:35.136-07:002015-06-23T15:42:35.136-07:00Darn…guess CW isn't gonna tell me the magical ...Darn…guess CW isn't gonna tell me the magical words which can convince Cons to stop being useful idiots for Israel, the military-police-state-industrial-complex...KingKrawFishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13612634065260906829noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-48599629774381782792015-06-20T17:55:08.405-07:002015-06-20T17:55:08.405-07:00Mitt Romney, the Republican nominee for president ...Mitt Romney, the Republican nominee for president in 2012, called for the immediate removal of the Confederate battle flag from outside the South Carolina Statehouse<br /><br />http://news.yahoo.com/confederate-flag-sets-off-debate-gop-2016-class-190435917--election.html<br /><br />[Eye-roll]…there's your PC pansy Conservative standard-bearer...KingKrawFishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13612634065260906829noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-39064257427321491802015-06-20T17:12:27.524-07:002015-06-20T17:12:27.524-07:00My vote is moot. Calif is a Democrat stronghold t...My vote is moot. Calif is a Democrat stronghold thanks to Reagan's amnesty. That said I'm proud to have helped prevent Insane McCain (wanted to go to war over GEORGIA--nucking futs!) from starting WWIII against Russia. I know neocons are incapable of learning from history, but the LAST regime (NAZI Germany) that messed w/Russia got totally destroyed…it'd be fitting if Russia ended up saving the world from the current incarnation of NAZI Germany (NEOCON America).<br /><br />Again, its not RP's fault that Cons (and Libs) can't tell a good idea/policy from a bad one. If you know the words libertarians can use in order to convince Cons to stop being useful idiots for Israel, Saudi Arabia, the military-industrial complex, and oil companies by all means tell me what they are!<br /><br />Yes, I am pretty ignorant (tho the ignorance of non-libertarian Americans makes me look like an expert) about the history/complexity of the middle-east…but at least I know I'm ignorant and don't think the USGovt. is capable of centrally-planning its affairs. Bottom line: we've seen the results of neocon-inspired foreign-policy, but the fools who cheer-led for the wars remain blinded. Funny how the USA never had problems w/the Islamic World until it stuck its big, fat nose into the middle-east's business post-WWII…amazing how when you meddle in others' affairs and take sides in conflicts that have nothing to do w/you they tend not to like it, eh?<br /><br />Like I said, even WE'RE surprised by your refusal to learn, but by all means, keep sticking your head in the hornet's nest and wondering why you pull it out w/welts all over…I for one will enjoy seeing Cons' oh-so-dear military continue being torn to shreds by the Islamic militias and/or Russia and/or China…nothing like seeing a bully (USA) get his comeuppance! And if you DON'T think a major comeuppance is on the way if a major shift in policy isn't initiated, then you're as clueless as the "Durn Libruls!" you're always ranting about.<br /><br />After already-sick-of-war [non-neocon] Americans become REALLY fed up w/your wars they'll increasingly turn to more extreme Leftists in order to get peace…then you fools can have a heavier dose of socialism domestically to go w/your failed overseas wars.<br /><br />Remember: libertarians have been nearly 100% right all along…we'll be right on this one too. Then again, Con fools who still think Vietnam was a good idea can never be expected to learn a damned thing...<br /><br />KingKrawFishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13612634065260906829noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-9138370766297296612015-06-19T08:56:06.657-07:002015-06-19T08:56:06.657-07:00>>”Yeah, BHO absolutely sold himself as the ...>>”Yeah, BHO absolutely sold himself as the antiwar candidate (and the idiotic Left believed him).”<br /><br />Who’s the bigger idiot: someone who votes for Obama believing he’s anti-war and who likes his socialist schemes or a libertarian who despises socialism and votes for him knowing what a liar he is? <br /><br /><br />>>"Fantasy land, or…an educated guess based on RP's stellar record of integrity and courage in the face of all odds?"<br /><br />I’ll take Fantasy Land for $2,000, Alex. Observing RP’s persistent failures to sell his ideas to the public and concluding that he will be able to persuade democrats to consent to a Supreme Court justice with a record of upholding a strict interpretation of the Constitution doesn’t sound very “educated” to me.<br /><br />I<br />>>”The situation in the middle-east is incredibly convoluted and complex …ignorant and arrogant Americans have no clue…”<br /><br />That includes you. If it were simply a matter of keeping to ourselves and saying “live and let live (or live and kill each other) we could ignore what happens in the M.E.; but that’s not the reality at all. The world is a small place these days, and what happens in other places around the world has great potential to affect us. The notion of spreading democracy as a means of reigning in radicalism may be a pipe dream, but is it so evil that some might entertain the idea as an alternative to having large regions of the world controlled by tyrannical zealots? This is what I don’t understand about you and your kind. I don’t agree that turning a blind eye to the M.E. is the best strategy for us, but I understand why some might want to try it and I don’t hate people for suggesting it. <br /><br /><br />>>”Libertarians don't think much of Cons' foreign-policy ideas, but even we're surprised at how little they've learned from their own mistakes…in fact most of y'all haven't learned a damned thing.”<br /><br />The fool with no accomplishments of his own comforts himself by scorning those who try and fail.<br />CWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18093393578438689105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-2450406910764843812015-06-18T15:52:58.558-07:002015-06-18T15:52:58.558-07:00Yeah, BHO absolutely sold himself as the antiwar c...Yeah, BHO absolutely sold himself as the antiwar candidate (and the idiotic Left believed him). In a way I guess he was the Peace Candidate--relative to that insane old man the GOP nominated in 2008. Probably the PC relative to Romney as well, tho they were probably far more alike than not war-wise.<br /><br />Fantasy land, or…an educated guess based on RP's stellar record of integrity and courage in the face of all odds? <br /><br /> The situation in the middle-east is incredibly convoluted and complex (in some part thanks to the USA)…neocon intellectuals (and Cons who foolishly listened and still listen to them for some reason) have been proven utterly incompetent and wrong in thinking the US military could impose some kind of Western-style democratic order there. The Muslim nations are almost all artificial constructs and there are deep schisms in Islam…ignorant and arrogant Americans have no clue…Muslims are gonna have to fight/figure it out for themselves just like Christianity and Western Europe had to.<br /><br />Libertarians don't think much of Cons' foreign-policy ideas, but even we're surprised at how little they've learned from their own mistakes…in fact most of y'all haven't learned a damned thing.KingKrawFishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13612634065260906829noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-79915175185558097082015-06-18T07:23:07.025-07:002015-06-18T07:23:07.025-07:00>>”I'm guessing he would've found a ...>>”I'm guessing he would've found a way to get his scotus nominations thru…”<br /><br />It must be nice to live in Fantasy land.<br /><br /><br />>>” I give Cons a hard time about Reagan simply because you guys are totally delusional about him …”<br /><br />You guys? Would you care to show me which posts of mine led you to conclude that I’m delusional about Reagan? <br /><br />There’s been some martyrdom of Reagan that’s not entirely justified, I will willingly concede that; but he is certainly not the evil dunce that you persistently imply he is as evidence by the esteem in which he is held by you own beloved Ron Paul. Your own views on Reagan are just as deluded, if not more so, than those of the ‘cons’ you so despise.<br /><br />CWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18093393578438689105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-3092498970632274682015-06-18T07:08:11.190-07:002015-06-18T07:08:11.190-07:00No, I don’t believe Obama is “anti-war,” hence the...No, I don’t believe Obama is “anti-war,” hence the reason I put that descriptor in quotes, but that’s the way he sold himself, there’s NO doubt whatsoever about that, and his desire to be seen as the anti-war potus is at the heart of many of the dumb things he’s done (such as announcing precisely when our troops will be leaving). BTW, didn’t you tell me you voted for Obama because he was preferable to the neocons???<br /><br />To be fair, I don’t consider RP in the same league with Obama. I credit RP for sincerely caring about this nation. But what’s happened under Obama ought to be a lesson to those who think having peace is a simple matter of withdrawing our military presence from their stations around the world. It’s just not that simple, which is why the child-king Obama withdraws here while ramping things up over there. <br />CWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18093393578438689105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-10725019008422894022015-06-18T06:44:35.937-07:002015-06-18T06:44:35.937-07:00Well, being Ron Paul was strong enough to stand fi...Well, being Ron Paul was strong enough to stand firm against every pressure group/person (including President Reagan) who tried to get him to violate his principles…I'm guessing he would've found a way to get his scotus nominations thru (unlike Con Republicans who always seem to cave to Dems). I'm also guessing he wouldn't've nominated a liberal woman scotus member just for the sake of his legacy (like Reagan). One things for sure…a RP scotus judge would NEVER have approved of ACA.<br /><br />That said, I give Cons a hard time about Reagan simply because you guys are totally delusional about him and his legacy…most of you still act as if he was some kind of govt.-slashing hero…and y'all defend this lying politician despite the fact that he hoodwinked you, effectively destroyed your ideology, and his Amnesty and keeping the DOE is as responsible as anything for Democrat electoral success today.<br />KingKrawFishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13612634065260906829noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-37586147732280302422015-06-18T06:31:24.044-07:002015-06-18T06:31:24.044-07:00You think Democrat neocon Obama is "anti-war&...You think Democrat neocon Obama is "anti-war"?!<br /><br />Holy cow you're insane...KingKrawFishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13612634065260906829noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-31859131797610531522015-06-18T06:10:45.359-07:002015-06-18T06:10:45.359-07:00>>”…Cons re-defining the word "isolatio...>>”…Cons re-defining the word "isolationism"…<br /><br />Whines the hypocrite who repeatedly throws around terms like “war lovers” and “war mongers” to describe all conservatives. Looked in the mirror lately?<br /><br /><br />>>”We know who the real nut-cases (hint: the people who still think Iraq-Af and neoconism were/are swell ideas) are now, don't we?”<br /><br />My definition of a nutcase is someone who can see the experiment of an “anti-war” president playing out in real time right before his eyes and he still thinks THAT’S a swell strategy. After 6 ½ years of management under the Nobel Peace Prize winner the world looks so much better, eh?<br /><br /><br />>>”I'm gonna have a filed day w/Cons if Reagan's scotus appointee (who originally said ACA was unconstitutional) saves Obamacare…you people just make it TOO easy...”<br /><br />Yeah, because Superman president Ron Paul would have found the perfect, strict constitutionalist (putting aside the contradiction of your disdain for the Constitution) AND would have persuaded democrats in the senate to go along with his perfect choice, because we all know how great he is at persuading people to his point of view. Who was it who wisely said, “The fool with no accomplishments of his own comforts himself by laughing at those who try and fail”…? Oh yes, that was me.<br />CWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18093393578438689105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-71616198130822288952015-06-17T16:14:04.679-07:002015-06-17T16:14:04.679-07:00Yeah, its Ron Paul's fault that Cons are too d...Yeah, its Ron Paul's fault that Cons are too dumb to reason with [EYE ROLL]…as well as Cons re-defining the word "isolationism"…<br /><br />We know who the real nut-cases (hint: the people who still think Iraq-Af and neoconism were/are swell ideas) are now, don't we? <br /><br />I'm gonna have a filed day w/Cons if Reagan's scotus appointee (who originally said ACA was unconstitutional) saves Obamacare…you people just make it TOO easy...KingKrawFishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13612634065260906829noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-42865022061153948602015-06-17T07:29:29.787-07:002015-06-17T07:29:29.787-07:00Ron Paul’s inability to articulately defend himsel...Ron Paul’s inability to articulately defend himself against the charges of isolationism and sell Americans on his vision made him his own worst enemy. It didn’t help him that he had ranting nutcases like you singing his praises either. <br /><br />BTW, this will be the last comment from you that allow if it contains “LOL.” You’ve exceeded your limit as well as repeatedly proving yourself unworthy of the constant giggling. Grow up or go away.<br />CWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18093393578438689105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-76256100516964681782015-06-17T07:16:36.023-07:002015-06-17T07:16:36.023-07:00LOL…are we talking about the same Ron Paul who sai...LOL…are we talking about the same Ron Paul who said in the above-mentioned speech in 2004?:<br /><br />“Ronald Reagan was one of the most eloquent exponents of the freedom philosophy in modern American politics. One of his greatest achievements is the millions of Americans he helped convert to the freedom philosophy and the many he inspired to become active in the freedom movement.” <br /><br />“While many associate Ronald Reagan with unbridled militarism, he was a lifelong opponent of the draft. It is hardly surprising that many of the most persuasive and powerful arguments against conscription came from President Reagan.” <br /><br />Doesn’t sound to me like RP thought of Reagan as a “total fraud,” so I would suggest those are YOUR sentiments, not his. <br /><br />There’s no doubt RR made some mistakes as POTUS and there is also no doubt that it is far more difficult to have your own way in a divided government than simpletons like yourself can appreciate. I can only assume that is why a man of principle like RP, who strongly disagreed with some of the things RR did as POTUS (as do I) nevertheless still sincerely appreciated RR and recognized him for what he did achieve. I would bet my life that RP would volunteer to give no such speech for Obama if he suddenly passed away tomorrow. But then RP is a man. You are still a child, and a very silly one at that. <br />CWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18093393578438689105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3073481508407030104.post-73363291166026408822015-06-17T06:46:59.456-07:002015-06-17T06:46:59.456-07:00Smart, principled, committed to expanding liberty ...Smart, principled, committed to expanding liberty and promoting a small-govt. interpretation of the Constitution, and gentlemanly as his kind words for Fraud Reagan prove…but Cons didn't want that, they wanted McCain and Romney, LOL...KingKrawFishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13612634065260906829noreply@blogger.com